We start with the question a reader is trying to answer, then trace the technology back to the mechanism that makes it work. The goal is a useful explanation in plain English, with enough detail to show where the limits are.
Sources and verification
- We prefer primary research, scientific reviews, standards bodies, public health agencies, universities and technical documentation from organizations that build or study the technology.
- When a manufacturer is the source of a product claim, we identify that context and seek independent support for broader claims.
- We distinguish a laboratory demonstration from a commercially available device and avoid presenting an emerging technology as settled or routine.
- We link to relevant sources in substantive articles so readers can inspect the evidence and learn more.
Clear explanations
We define technical terms at first use, explain what a device measures or changes, and compare methods where that helps. For medical topics, we separate how a tool works from when a clinician might choose it. The right clinical choice depends on the individual situation and belongs with qualified professionals.
Corrections and updates
If a source changes, a claim proves inaccurate or a reader points out a gap, we review the evidence and revise the article. Significant corrections should be made clear in the affected article. Send a source, question or correction to contact@mirsurg.eu.